Production without a tool

End-Use Parts

Somewhere between ten parts and ten thousand, tooling stops making sense. Additive fills that gap with parts that go into the product, not into a review.

10–1000 part runsNo tooling costTraceable materialsInspected and documented
A tray of finished 3D printed end-use production parts ready to ship
7K+Parts 3D printed
12Documented materials
1Minimum order quantity
DFMReview with every quote
A decade in the field

Trusted, recognised and featured

Ashok Leyland
Cisco ThingQbator
TVS Motor Company
Godrej
Decathlon
IIT Bombay
IIT Jammu
IIT Tirupati
Indian Institute of Science
Bangalore Institute of Technology
KLE Technological University
Bharati Vidyapeeth, Pune
Manipal Universal Technology Business Incubator
NASSCOM Foundation
Ministry of Science and Technology, India
Ministry of Heavy Industries, India
Make in India
Startup India
Startup Karnataka
The Economic Times
The Times of India
YourStory
Entrepreneur
Deccan Herald
Deccan Chronicle
AFAR
3D Printing Industry
A production part measured on an inspection bench
Why it works

Where the Tool Never Pays Back

An injection tool is a fixed cost paid before the first part exists, and it is only rational if enough parts follow it. Below that break-even — a product still finding its market, a spare with a demand of forty a year, a variant that exists for one customer — the tool is the reason the part does not get made.

Additive removes the fixed cost entirely. The hundredth part costs about what the first one did, which is bad economics at volume and excellent economics below it. It also means the design can change on part 41 without scrapping anything.

Talk to an Engineer
Design rules

Six Things That Decide Whether It Works

The mistakes that come back to us, and how to design them out before the file is sent.

Design for the process, not around it

A part redesigned for additive — consolidated, ribbed rather than solid, supports designed out — is cheaper, lighter and stronger than a moulded part reprinted as-is.

Pick the process for consistency, not speed

For runs, HP MJF and SLS give far more repeatable properties part-to-part than any extrusion process.

Specify inspection up front

Tell us the critical dimensions before the run, not after. First-article inspection on part one is cheap; discovering it on part 200 is not.

Fix the material and record the batch

For an end-use part the feedstock batch is recorded per job, so a good run can be reproduced deliberately.

Decide the finish before the run

Dyeing an SLS or MJF batch is uniform and permanent; painting one is neither, and it costs more.

Consolidate assemblies

The cheapest end-use part is the three parts and two fasteners it replaced.

Material selection

Which Material for Which Part

The partProcess & materialWhy
10–50 partsSLS or vacuum castingNesting or a silicone tool both beat one-at-a-time
50–1000 partsHP MJF · Nylon 12Layer-at-a-time fusing: a full chamber is the cheap case
Large single partsFDM · CF-Nylon or PCUp to 700 × 400 × 400 mm in one piece
Chemically exposedFDM · PPInert to most acids, alkalis and solvents
Outdoor serviceFDM · ASAUV-stable for years, not seasons
Flexible partsFDM · TPU 95AGaskets, bumpers, grips and dampers
Pick a process

How We Would Make It

Related

People Who Print This Also Print

Send us the part

Upload the file and tell us the quantity and what it has to survive. You will get a design-for-manufacturability review and a price back — not just a price.